Why Did China Relax Its "One-child" Policy in 2015 and Allow Two Children Per Family? Quizlet
Lancet. Writer manuscript; bachelor in PMC 2018 May 10.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC5944611
NIHMSID: NIHMS961279
The effects of China'southward universal two-child policy
Abstract
In October, 2015, Red china'due south one-kid policy was replaced by a universal two-kid policy. The furnishings of the new policy are inevitably speculative, but predictions can exist made based on recent trends. The population increment will be relatively small, peaking at ane·45 billion in 2029 (compared with a peak of 1·4 billion in 2023 if the one-child policy continued). The new policy will allow almost all Chinese people to have their preferred number of children. The benefits of the new policy include: a large reduction in abortions of unapproved pregnancies, virtual elimination of the problem of unregistered children, and a more normal sex ratio. All of these furnishings should improve wellness outcomes. Effects of the new policy on the shrinking workforce and rapid population ageing will not be axiomatic for two decades. In the concurrently, more audio policy actions are needed to see the social, wellness, and care needs of the elderly population.
Introduction
In October, 2015, Cathay announced that the iconic one-kid policy had finally been replaced by a universal two-kid policy. This modify is highly meaning because, for the first fourth dimension in 36 years, no one in China is restricted to having just 1 child. In this Review, we examine the testify for the potential effects of this shift in policy. The consequences are inevitably speculative, only a body of inquiry has developed that aims to foresee the demographic, health, social, and policy furnishings of the universal two-child policy. Because much of this research is based on the effects of the preceding policy, we start with an analysis of the impact and controversies surrounding the one-child policy.
The ane-child policy
The one-child policy was introduced in 1979 by the Chinese Government who considered population containment every bit essential to lifting Communist china out of severe poverty caused by decades of economical mismanagement.one Betwixt 1950 and 1970, the population had increased from 540 million to more than than 800 one thousand thousand.2 In response, the authorities introduced the generally voluntary later-longer-fewer policy in the 1970s, which encouraged later childbearing, longer spacing between children, and fewer children. This policy led to a large fall in the total fertility rate from an estimated 5·9 births per adult female in 1970, to two·9 births per woman by 1979. Despite this downward trajectory in fertility, fears of overpopulation persisted, and then the one-kid policy was introduced. Following the introduction of the policy, the total fertility rate continued to autumn only less precipitously. Information from numerous sources showed that by the late 1990s the total fertility rate had fallen to between 1·5 and 1·7, and it has remained at this level since (figure 1).4,v
Full fertility rate in China, from 1950 to 2014
Data from United Nations Population Partitioning Section of Economic and Social Diplomacy.three
The 1-child dominion was strictly enforced for urban residents, who in 1980 deemed for most 20% of the population, but most half by 2010. In rural areas, this rule was particularly unpopular and accounted most unenforceable,vi so from 1984 rural couples in well-nigh provinces were allowed to have a second child if their offset was a girl, the then-called 1·five-child policy. In the six northwestern provinces, all rural couples were allowed a 2nd child, irrespective of the sexual activity of the first child. Two or more children were allowed for ethnic minorities, who account for around 9% of the total population.2 These variations created a substantial divergence in total fertility rate between rural and urban regions.7 Enforcement was the responsibleness of the then powerful National Family Planning Commission. The system of penalties was unpopular and inconsistently practical, with wide variations across the country, often at the discretion of local officials.8
As i of the nearly controversial policies in history, debate has raged over the positive and negative effects of the ane-child policy. The government claim that 400 one thousand thousand births accept been prevented, which contributed to increasing per capita Gross domestic product.9 But this asssertion is contested by claims that the higher number of prevented births includes the effects of the later-longer-fewer policy, and that the one-kid policy has prevented closer to 200 million births.10 In addition, many scholars believe that rapid economic development alone would have reduced fertility substantially, as has been the instance in many other developing countries, such as Thailand where the total fertility charge per unit decreased from 5·six in 1970, to two·1 in 1990.11 This possibility, together with the very rapid autumn in fertility during the later on-longer-fewer policy, raises the obvious question of whether the 1-kid policy was ever necessary at all.
The health outcomes of the one-child policy are also debated. Women take benefited from fewer pregnancies and births, which has contributed to a fall in the maternal mortality charge per unit over the past three decades.12 However, this reward has been at the cost of deprivation of reproductive option, not only in family size, but also in contraceptive choice. The insertion of intrauterine devices post partum without formal consent was routine in rural Red china, with permission needed for removal to have a second child.13 Pregnancies that were unapproved under the policy (including any occurring exterior marriage) have always been problematic. Most women undergo abortions voluntarily, just there are many accounts of forced abortions and sterilisations ordered by over-zealous local officials. Such atrocities peaked in the early years of the one-child policy, but have been rare over the past decade.eight
There have been social benefits for women, with an acceleration of movement towards gender equality. The traditional preference for a son led many Chinese parents to invest relatively piffling in their daughters, but in the absenteeism of brothers, household resource could focus on daughters.14 Studies have constitute no meaning differences between single-girl and unmarried-boy families in relation to health outcomes and education (in terms of access, aspiration, or achievement), although differences take been recorded between brothers and sisters, with boys attending school on average 6 months longer.15,16 Women at present business relationship for 52% of undergraduates and 48% of postgraduates.17 Low fertility has also increased the chances of well-paid piece of work and career advancement for women. More than a quarter of CEOs of medium and big Chinese companies are women.18 This improvement in gender equality has contributed to improved health outcomes for young and middle-anile women.
A farther controversy is the caste to which the one-child policy has contributed to the highly skewed sex activity ratio at birth. The sex ratio at nascency, defined every bit the number of male births for every 100 female births, started to rising afterwards the onset of the one-child policy, but this trend accelerated farther after diagnostic ultrasound for sexual practice determination became available from the late 1980s.19 Although sex activity determination is illegal in China,20 the high sex ratio at nativity shows the lack of effective enforcement. The sex ratio at birth peaked at 121 in 2005, with latest estimates showing a autumn to 116 in 2014, but with ratios as high as 140 in parts of rural central China.20,21 In rural areas, the ratio rises greatly with 2nd births, as couples try to ensure a male nascence inside the two-child limit. Past 2020, in that location will be around 30 meg excess, and hence unmarriageable, men of reproductive age in a country where getting married and having children is still a stiff cultural expectation.20,22 This situation could accept considerable mental health consequences: never-married middle-aged and older men have significantly higher levels of depression,23,24 they are more than prone to assailment than married men, and may be more easily drawn into criminal offense, leading to concerns near social instability.21,25,26
There is as well considerable debate around the furnishings of the one-child policy on the wellbeing of children. These effects accept been characterised past a stereotype of parents and grandparents overindulging the only-child, creating spoiled, selfish, unsociable, and obese so-called little emperors.27 Just the evidence is mixed. For case, studies that command for confounders evidence that only children have college academic achievement, higher self-esteem, and greater confidence,28–31 all of which might contribute to better health outcomes. These effects are partly attributed to household resources being directed towards the merely child with overall beneficial effects on education and health.32 However, there is also evidence to the contrary: a series of studies in young adult soldiers have shown that soldiers with siblings are significantly more motivated, hard working, obedient, sociable, and mentally stable than are those who are only children.33–37
There is less controversy about the effects of the one-child policy on the apace growing ageing population.38 Indeed, fears nearly the ageing population have probably been the nigh influential gene in the decision to elevator the one-kid policy. Although ageing populations are increasing worldwide, the one-child policy has rapidly accelerated the process in Prc. The effect of large numbers of but children on family structures has its ain name in China: the 4:two:1 outcome, referring to couples who are responsible for the care of their four older parents and i child. Despite the land-sponsored New Rural Old Age Insurance Programme, which started in 2009, most Chinese elderly people, peculiarly those in rural areas, still lack full alimony coverage, then are largely dependent on their children for financial support.7,39 Confucian tradition nevertheless dictates that intendance of the elderly parents is a filial duty. Prc is perhaps unique in having laws that developed children tin can be compelled to provide financial support to their elderly parents.40 This culture places a considerable burden on 4:2:1 families. Although sons accept traditionally supported parents financially,41 daughters (and sons-in-constabulary) accept by and large cared for their older parents.42,43 Thus, the shortage of women, partly caused by the one-child policy, is affecting the quantity and quality of elderly care, particularly in rural areas. The growth in the elderly population is besides putting serious pressures on the health arrangement, which is not yet adapted to deal with the circuitous and expensive comorbidities of an ageing population.44
The introduction of the universal two-child policy
Demographers warned of the negative consequences of the one-child policy almost from the outset.45–51 Their arguments centred on the fact that the demographic dividend—ie, the accelerated economical growth that results from a decline in fertility and mortality—was reversing. Presently, the negative consequences were beginning to outweigh the positive. The negatives include accelerating population ageing, the skewed sex ratio, and the decline in the working-historic period population, which would threaten economic growth. Moreover, in 1980 the government had pledged that the one-kid policy would last for only one generation, so change was overdue. But opposite to the views of virtually demographers,seven,51–55 the government feared that lifting the policy would atomic number 82 to a baby nail, and then the government's response has been cautious with a series of gradually introduced exemptions. By 2007, all provinces (except Henan, which followed in 2011) had started to permit couples who were both only-children to have two children. In November, 2013, came a policy allowing couples in which at to the lowest degree ane of the marital partners was an but-child to have two children. Simply by May, 2015, only 1·45 million (13·2%) of eleven 1000000 eligible couples practical for permission to accept a second kid.56 The low uptake has been attributed to the high price of rearing children in cities, considering the overwhelming majority of these eligible couples were urban residents.57 The couples who applied for a 2d child were younger, had higher household income, a immature first child more than probable to be girl, and parents who wanted a second grandchild.58 This low uptake, together with appeals from scholars and the media, accept probably accelerated the proclamation of the universal two-child policy.
The potential furnishings of the universal ii-child policy
Effects on fertility
The fertility level afterwards the universal two-child policy is a central factor that will affect population growth, the proportion of elderly people, the workforce and economic development, the sex ratio, public wellness, health systems, and the environment. But the effects of the new policy may be less than expected. In that location is now articulate bear witness that the role of fertility policy is diminishing fast, and that fertility in contemporary China, as elsewhere, is socioeconomically determined.8,xi
Surveys of fertility preference59–61 undertaken over the past two decades show that China has indeed become a low fertility culture, and such surveys are generally thought to somewhat overestimate bodily fertility.62,63 The overall consensus from these studies is that around 90% of women report they want one or two children, whereas in large cities nigh two-thirds of women state a preference for simply one kid. Reasons given include the high cost of rearing children, peculiarly for education, and the upshot on parental lifestyle and on the mother's career.64–66
The claiming is that future fertility cannot be accurately forecast, because of its various uncertain determinants. For instance, the lower fertility preference in urban areas together with the current drive towards urbanisation (70% urbanisation planned by 2030), is likely to go on fertility low. However, several scholars believe the preference for two children will gather momentum.67 We nowadays here the most likely scenario of changes in Chinese fertility in the adjacent few decades based on various demographic analyses. Given the lower socioeconomic level in rural areas, and the fact that minority ethnic groups are immune iii or more than children, the total fertility rate is assumed to rise from the current 2·01 in rural areas and i·24 in urban areas, to 2·xv and 1·67, respectively, in the next decade. The combined rural–urban total fertility rate is estimated to be one·88 in 2017, and 1·81 in 2030.7
In the give-and-take to follow, we explore the projected effects of the universal two-kid policy, cartoon comparisons with the scenario of the ane-child policy remaining in place. These projections are based on population projections using the assumed total fertility rates outlined above, and with the same background demographic parameters (such as medium bloodshed and rural–urban migration).seven
Effects on population ageing
The Chinese population would age quickly under either policy scheme (figure 2). The percentage of over-65s under the universal two-kid policy is expected to achieve 18% in 2030, with the proportion about twice as high in rural areas than in urban areas.7,68 Population ageing is a global occurrence: today, the UK's over-65s account for 17% of the total population, and Japan'south 26%.69 The rapid acceleration in the ageing population associated with the 1-child policy has created a significant claiming for China and population ageing will exist substantially less serious with the universal two-child policy than if the one-child policy remained unchanged (figure 2). There are two particularly vulnerable groups of elderly people in People's republic of china. The first is the so-called empty-nesters (living in households without children), mainly caused by the large out-migration of young people during rapid urbanisation and job mobility.7,38 Around half of these empty-nesters alive lone and one-half with a spouse.seventy Their numbers will rise over the next two decades and the proportion in rural areas will grow to twice of that in urban areas by 2050.seven Empty-nesters, especially those living solitary, are especially prone to mental health issues.71 The 2nd vulnerable group is disabled elderly people. The number of disabled people anile older than 65 years is predicted to increase rapidly from 8·4 million in 2010, to 19 million in 2030, and 37 1000000 in 2050.72 Many of these people are in the farthermost elderly historic period group (≥fourscore years) and their wellness care, personal, and social intendance needs nowadays a huge challenge.
Percentages of all people aged ≥65 years and people aged ≥65 years living in empty-nest households among total population
Data from Zeng et al.7
Furnishings on population size, workforce, and economical development
The universal two-child policy is predicted to lead to a height population of around i·45 billion in 2029 and so gradually pass up (tabular array). Under a continuing one-child policy scenario, the population would peak at effectually 1·xl billion in 2023 so apace decline (table). The total population size under the one-child policy would be smaller than nether the universal two-child policy (table), which would cause serious problems for ageing, pension fund deficiencies, and labour shortages.73,74 Nether a continuing one-child policy, two-fifths of the reduced population size in 2030, and one-one-half in 2050, would be anile 18–64 years (ie, of working historic period), and the other reductions would be in children anile 0–17 (ie, the forthcoming workforce; figure 3).7 The workforce volition not exist affected by the new policy in the short term. It will slowly decline until 2020 and moderately pass up from 2020 to 2030, with no difference between the two policies. But across 2030, increased births nether the universal two-child policy would pb to a essentially larger workforce, past 30 meg in 2040, and 60 million in 2050, compared to the unchanged one-child policy (figure 3). A big working-age population has been shown to exist crucial to economic growth. Nearly 27% of the increase in Chinese GDP from 1982 to 2000 is estimated to be due to the large working-age population, which resulted from the babe boom of the 1950s and 1960s.75 Elsewhere in Asia, plentiful labour contributed substantially to the rapid growth of Gdp in South korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and Hong Kong in the 1970s and 1980s.76 These factors add forcefulness to the positive and economic effects of the universal two-child policy.77,78
Number of people in labour strength (historic period 18–64 years)
Units are 100 millions. Data from Zeng et al.vii
Tabular array
Projected population size (in billions) nether different fertility policy scenarios, 2010–l
| Universal two-child policy | One-child policy | |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 1·340 | 1·340 |
| 2020 | 1·423 | 1·396 |
| 2030 | 1·445 | 1·386 |
| 2040 | one·441 | 1·348 |
| 2050 | ane·420 | 1·269 |
| Twelvemonth of peak population size | 2029 | 2023 |
| Population size in elevation year | 1·445 | one·399 |
The elderly dependency ratio will increase sharply under either policy scenario. Defined as the number of people aged older than 65 years divided by number of working-age people aged 18–64 years, it is desirable that this figure remains low in any population. Only after 2030 will the demographic benefits of the two-child policy get evident in producing a considerably lower elderly dependency ratio than the one-child policy (effigy 4).7 Further, the universal two-child policy transition volition result in greater consumption and chore opportunities associated with childbearing and child-rearing, which will contribute to economic growth.
Elderly dependency ratios
Information from Zeng et al.7
Effects on the sexual activity ratio
The 2000 census data show that in areas with a 1·5-child policy, the sex ratio at birth was as high as 125 compared with 109 in areas with a ii-kid policy, which suggests that the ane·5-child policy has specifically exacerbated China'south loftier sex ratio at birth.79 This policy was interpreted by many Chinese people as implying that ane boy was sufficient to ensure family welfare, but 1 daughter was non, and thus that female children had bottom value, reinforcing the culture of preference for sons and increasing China's sexual practice ratio at birth.v,lxxx,81 Prove of this effect emerged from an experimental program in iv rural areas (with a full population of eight meg) in iv provinces. In these areas, a two-child policy operated from the mid-1980s. The issue was essentially lower sexual activity ratios than those in the surrounding rural areas where the ane·5-child policy had been implemented.82 Furthermore, slightly more than one-quarter of the excess sex ratio at birth in the one·5-kid policy areas is due to the structural effects of not allowing couples whose first kid is a boy to have a second birth.5 On this prove, adopting the universal two-child policy will brand significant contributions to reducing the sex ratio at birth in China, but it is unlikely to totally normalise for many years to come, because of the long-standing preference for sons, especially in rural areas, and continued access to sex-selective technologies.
Furnishings on population health
Replacing the one-child policy with the universal two-child policy will have positive effects on health for children, adults, and elderly people.
The new policy will greatly reduce or eliminate some of the most serious effects on children of the one-child policy. Although already uncommon, the practise of abandonment of unwanted girls soon subsequently birth, with institutionalisation in orphanages and negative health and social consequences, should become much rarer. Similarly, and then-called blacklisted, out-of-quota children should finish to be. These are children without household registration, acquired past their parents' violation of the ane-child policy and their refusal or inability to pay the penalty. Lacking registration creates barriers to the child's educational opportunity and social status, with consequent poorer mental wellness outcomes in many cases.83 In fact, with the annunciation of the two-child policy, the status of existing blacklisted children is being normalised.84 The new policy is also likely to reduce discrimination in nutrition, educational activity, and health care against girls, which persists in some rural areas.85
With respect to the health of adults, the new policy should substantially reduce the tragedy of many millions of abortions due to so-called out-of-quota second pregnancies. In addition, there will be a substantial reduction in sex-selective abortions, which presents a considerable wellness gamble since they are of necessity washed late, during the second trimester.86 Equally the sex ratio at birth decreases with the new policy, there volition be a concomitant reduction in the numbers of unmarriageable men with higher rates of depression and other mental health problems.21,24
Perhaps the nigh feared family tragedy nether the one-child policy was the premature death of an only-child. Data from the 2000 census showed that the boilerplate probability of the but-child's decease was four% earlier their mother reached age 45 years, 12% before they reached 80 years, xvi% before 85 years, and 21% before they reached 90 years.87 Permanent childlessness for a couple or lone parent can accept potentially serious consequences for their mental and physical health,88 especially when many elderly Chinese people depend on offspring for care. Demographers have estimated that there were about 1 meg permanently childless families considering of expiry of the only-child in 2010, and the number has been increasing by nigh 78 000 every year.89 It is expected that this socially undesirable trend will substantially reject under the universal two-kid policy.
Evidence from longitudinal healthy ageing surveys42,90 indicates that elderly people cared for by daughters (and sons-in-law) rather than sons (and daughters-in-law) accept a lower mortality and lower probability of declining cerebral capacity. Further bear witness suggests that older parents are more satisfied with care provided by daughters than by sons, and that older parents have better relationships with their daughters than sons.43 The implementation of the one-child policy, especially in cities, prevented virtually one-half of all couples from having a daughter; the new policy will afford many more than couples the opportunity of a daughter. The result will eventually be more elderly parents benefiting from the care of daughters, thus enhancing their mental and physical wellness.42,43
Effects on wellness systems
Although the new policy is unlikely to lead to a very big increment in the boilerplate birth rate for Mainland china as whole, highly heterogeneous evolution across the state ways that increases in fertility may be greater in particular regions, such as in some rural areas and pocket-sized towns. The regime will need to monitor these changes locally, so that increased capacity in health services, particularly maternal and child health services, can be planned every bit necessary.
A major business organisation is the acute shortage of paediatricians and paediatric nurses across the country, which has worsened over the past decade.91 Lower incomes, highly pressured working conditions, and demanding parents all contribute to the unpopularity of paediatrics as a specialty.92 So whatsoever increase in nascence rate resulting from the two-kid policy volition exacerbate pressures on an already stressed organization. A study93 based on birth rate predictions until 2020 estimated that around 190 000 more paediatricians are needed. Although overall numbers of personnel in maternal and child health services are sufficient, in that location are concerns for the quality of these services.92 Quality could deteriorate if pressure on these services increases with the birth rate.
Effects on natural resource and environment
In the past few decades, growth in the Chinese population has been widely causeless to threaten natural resources and the environment. Notwithstanding, evidence suggests that this is unlikely to occur as a consequence of the universal two-child policy. Outset, the overall increase in population will be small, with a peak of approximately 3% higher total population than would occur nether the one-child policy. Second, it is truthful that in 2011, water and land resource per person in China were reduced by xxx% and 36%, respectively, compared with 1979, attributable to population growth. But the declines levelled off afterwards 2000. Under the universal two-kid policy, the Chinese average h2o resource per person and average abundant state per person would attain the lowest value around 2029 (reduced by about 2% and 6%, respectively, compared with 2011), and then kickoff to gradually increase every bit the total population size decreases later 2029.vii
The other effects
The new policy will allow almost all couples to meet their reproductive preference.59,threescore No longer volition couples confront the consequences of penalties and stress associated with having an unapproved second child. A divisiveness was created by the one-kid policy, with different rules applying to neighbours and friends, every bit well as resentment towards the wealthy who were able to afford the penalties for having two children. These negative effects are expected to exist totally eliminated. Further, the new policy volition greatly reduce the corruption associated with the enforcement of the one-child policy. This corruption included bribing of officials for permission for more than ane child, and the frequently unregulated collection of fines from birth control violators.51 All of these outcomes will aid to create a more harmonious gild, an attribute highly regarded by the Chinese Government and the people.
Policy implications and recommendations
Population ageing
The universal two-child policy was introduced principally to address the serious challenges of population ageing, one of the greatest challenges for Mainland china in the 21st century. Notwithstanding, in the adjacent twenty years the universal two-child policy will accept only a marginal upshot on the rapid acceleration in population ageing if no other adequate policy deportment are taken. Compared with some industrialised countries, where room is very limited for increasing fertility, raising retirement age, and expanding pension programmes in rural areas, Red china has iii unique opportunities to address the claiming of rapid population ageing. Start, the universal two-child policy volition essentially increase fertility in some localities, especially in rural areas and small-scale towns. Second, the exceptionally low compulsory retirement age can be raised. The retirement age in People's republic of china, 55 years for women and sixty years for men, is among the everyman in the earth. Increasing the retirement age improves concrete and mental health outcomes.94 Information technology prolongs pension contributions, improving the financial stability of the alimony system,95 while increasing post-retirement payments. It will also better the predicted labour shortage, seen as a consequence of 36 years of the one-child policy, while also buying the fourth dimension needed for the benefits of the universal two-kid policy to be fully realised. Third, state-sponsored alimony systems must exist strengthened, especially in rural areas, where rapid ageing volition be a greater trouble in the coming decades, due to continuing rural–urban migration of young people.vii These new rural old age insurance programmes will not just heighten senior citizens' welfare, but besides create a huge corporeality of capital by collecting premiums from hundreds of millions of new programme participants. This increased capital will contribute to further economic development. Greater financial independence for the elderly will likewise reduce reliance on sons, resulting in a more enlightened attitude towards the relative value of sons and daughters.
In add-on to these three primal policy actions, the government should ameliorate sensation and actively encourage alter in a number of areas. Iii-generation living arrangements (either co-residence or close proximity) should be encouraged. Such arrangements are peradventure peculiarly appropriate in People's republic of china, given the long and deep-rooted tradition of filial piety to onetime people.96 Older parents who live with their adult children have amend cognitive function, self-rated wellness, and life satisfaction.97 Since grandparents traditionally assume childcare responsibilities, such arrangements increase the workforce participation of female person developed children, with consequent fiscal and health benefits.98 They also decrease habitation-based care expenditures for disabled elderly.99 A policy encouraging 3-generation living was very successful in Singapore.100 In detail back up for rural elderly people to go to live with, or nigh, city-habitation children should be a priority.
Further, the benefits of daughters rather than sons for old age intendance42,43 should be widely publicised. Older parents should be encouraged to alive with (or nearby) an adult daughter and son-in-police, even if they have both son and daughter. This strategy would gradually change the tradition of daughters marrying-out of their ain families, would be benign for older adults, and as well assist to reduce the preference for sons, with obvious furnishings on the sex ratio at birth.
Finally, although the sex ratio at birth will decline with the beneficial effects of a more counterbalanced sexual activity ratio in the reproductive years, specially in rural areas, these effects can only exist gradual. In the meantime, the needs of ageing single men, equally an especially vulnerable group, will require recognition in policy. Overall, if sound policy actions are taken promptly and finer, Red china should be able to successfully accost the challenges of an ageing population.
Health systems
The shortfall in health personnel, especially in paediatrics, requires short-term and long-term solutions. In the curt term, much of the work currently done by paediatricians in acute hospitals is primary care in nature, and could be provided past maternal and child health doctors in community health centres. Such personnel would need to undergo enhanced brusque-term training in paediatrics, to upgrade their skills and thus amend service quality. In the longer term, measures should be taken to brand paediatrics more attractive equally a specialty, for case through bonus systems, improved working conditions, and incentives (linked to lower copayments) for parents to apply main care services and thus reduce the huge pressures on specialist paediatric services.
In addition, the opportunity to harness and redeploy the huge family planning workforce seems obvious. There are more than 5 million administrative bureaucrats and fieldworkers.6 There will be considerable spare capacity under the universal two-child policy, because the bureaucratic infrastructure for birth approvals and punishments for out-of-quota second births volition no longer be required. Grooming and redeployment of the current family planning workforce in elderly care and healthy ageing social piece of work would seem an obvious solution to address the challenges of the connected growth of an ageing population while providing productive jobs for these workers.
Decision
Since the onset of the one-kid policy massive socioeconomic change in China has led to a low fertility culture. The two-child policy will therefore not result in a baby boom, merely rather a moderate increase in fertility. But the many negative effects of the one-child policy will disappear and nearly all Chinese people will have their desired family size. The next step, the full removal of the fertility control policy, needs to be considered sooner rather than later.
In short, in the coming decades the universal ii-child policy will help to accost the challenge of population ageing, reduce the sex ratio at nativity, remove the more oppressive elements of the one-child policy, contribute to economical growth, and allow the overwhelming bulk of couples to take the number of children they want. The nascence rate must exist monitored locally, so that improved capacity in maternal and child wellness services can be planned equally necessary. Nosotros believe that the introduction of the universal two-kid policy was a necessary and highly desirable action that volition be beneficial for all sectors of Chinese gild.
Acknowledgments
YZ's research is funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (71110107025, 71233001, 71490732). Thursday has funding from the Economic and Social Research Quango (159372).
Footnotes
Contributors
Both authors searched the published work, wrote the showtime draft, and revised the Review.
Declaration of interests
We declare no competing interests.
References
i. Hesketh T, Zhu Westward. The one child family unit policy: the adept, the bad, and the ugly. BMJ. 1997;314:1685–87. [PMC gratis commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
ii. Hesketh T, Lu L, Xing Z. The result of Mainland china's ane-child family policy after 25 years. Northward Engl J Med. 2005;353:1171–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Zhang G, Zhao Z. Re-examining China's fertility puzzle: data drove and quality over the last 2 decades. Popul Dev Rev. 2006;32:293–321. [Google Scholar]
5. Zeng Y. Options of fertility policy transition in China. Popul Dev Rev. 2007;33:215–46. [Google Scholar]
vi. Greenhalgh S. Only one child: science and policy in Deng's China. Berkeley: Academy of California Press; 2008. [Google Scholar]
7. Zeng Y, Wang Z. A policy analysis on challenges and opportunities of population/household aging in Red china. J Popul Crumbling. 2014;7:255–81. [Google Scholar]
8. Wang F, Cai Y, Gu B. Population, policy, and politics: how will history estimate Communist china's 1-child policy? Popul Dev Rev. 2013;38:115–29. [Google Scholar]
10. Wang F, Mason A. Demographic dividend and prospects for economical evolution in Prc. United nations Expert Group Meeting on Social and Economic Implications of Changing Population Age Structures; New York: United nations; 2007. pp. 141–54. [Google Scholar]
11. Hirschman C, Tan J, Chamratrithirong A, Guest P. The path to below replacement-level fertility in Thailand. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 1994;20:82–107. [Google Scholar]
xiii. Doherty J, Norton E, Veney J. China'due south i-child policy: the economic choices and consequences faced by pregnant women. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:745–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Fong V. Red china's i-child policy and the empowerment of urban daughters. Am Anthropol. 2002;104:1098–109. [Google Scholar]
xv. Lee M. The one-kid policy and gender equality in education in People's republic of china: bear witness from household data. J Fam Econ Issues. 2012;33:41–52. [Google Scholar]
16. Tsui K, Rich 50. The only child and educational opportunity for girls in urban People's republic of china. Gender Soc. 2002;16:74–92. [Google Scholar]
17. National Agency of Statistics of China. Numbers of students in formal education by type and level (2013) Beijing: National Bureau of Statistics of Mainland china; 2014. [Google Scholar]
19. Zeng Y, Tu P, Gu B, Xu Y, Li B, Li Y. Causes and implications of the contempo increase in the reported sex activity ratio at birth in China. Popul Dev Rev. 1993;19:283–302. [Google Scholar]
20. Liu Z, Zhu Westward, Lu L, Hesketh T. China's backlog males, sexual practice selective ballgame, and one kid policy: analysis of information from 2005 National Intercensus Survey. BMJ. 2009;338:920–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Greenhalgh South. Patriarchal demographics? China's sexual practice ratio reconsidered. Popul Dev Rev. 2013;38:130–49. [Google Scholar]
22. Zhou X, Wang X, Li L, Hesketh T. The very high sex ratio in rural China: impact on the psychosocial wellbeing of unmarried men. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73:1422–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Zhou X, Yan Z, Therese H. Low and assailment in never-married men in China: a growing problem. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013;48:1087–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Zhou X, Li L, Yan Z, Hesketh T. High sex ratio as a correlate of depression in Chinese men. J Touch on Disord. 2013;144:79–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Hudson V, Den Boer A. A surplus of men, a deficit of peace: security and sex ratios in Asia's largest states. Int Sec. 2002;26:v–8. [Google Scholar]
26. Edlund L, Li H, Yi J, Zhang J. Sexual activity ratios and law-breaking: evidence from China. Rev Econ Stat. 2013;95:1520–34. [Google Scholar]
27. Cheng T. Cathay's petty Emperors: Medical consequences of China'southward one-kid policy. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:5121–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Yang J. China's i-kid policy and overweight children in the 1990s. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:2043–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. Hesketh T, Qu J, Tomkins A. Wellness effects of family size: cross sectional survey in Chinese adolescents. Curvation Dis Child. 2003;88:467–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Yang B, Ollendick T, Dong Q, Xia Y, Lin L. Only children and children with siblings in the People's Republic of Mainland china: levels of fear, anxiety, and depression. Child Dev. 1995;66:1301–eleven. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Poston DL, Falbo T. Academic performance and personality traits of Chinese children: "onlies" versus others. AJS. 1990;96:433–51. [Google Scholar]
32. Rosenzweig M, Zhang J. Practise population command policies induce more human uppercase investment; twins, birthweight and Cathay's on-child policy. Rev Econ Stud. 2009;76:1149–74. [Google Scholar]
33. Jiang Z, Zeng L, Li Q, Lan X, He Y. Furnishings of living atmospheric condition on the mental adaptation ability of the new soldiers. People's republic of china Occup Med. 2002;29:17–19. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
34. Li Q, Wang Y, Yang Y, et al. Report on mental stress, coping mode and social support level in the only-child new soldiers. China Occup Med. 2004;31:7–nine. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
35. Li C, Yan J, Xu T, Liu X, Cheng Fifty, Li Z. Assay of mental wellness status and its related factors in 1077 new soldiers. Acad J Sec Mil Med Univ. 2004;25:584–86. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
36. Liu X, Huang X. Survey study on the psychology health conditions of the but-kid soldiers. Health Psychol J. 2004;10:65–66. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
37. Wang A, Zhou Z, Zhang J. Soldiers' mental health and adaptation ability. Communist china J Health Psychol. 2006;14:481–84. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
38. Wang F. Can Red china afford to continue its one-child policy? AsianPacific Issues: Assay from the East-West Center. 2005:77. [Google Scholar]
39. Zhang Y, Goza F. Who will care for the elderly in China?: A review of the problems caused past China's one-kid policy and their potential solutions. J Aging Stud. 2006;20:151–64. [Google Scholar]
xl. Chen T, Turner J. Fragmentation in social security old age benefit provision in Communist china. J Crumbling Soc Policy. 2015;27:107–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41. Xie Y, Zhu H. Do sons or daughters give more than money to parents in urban China? J Matrimony Fam. 2009;71:174–86. [PMC costless article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42. Zeng Y, Brasher MS, Gu D, Vaupel JW. Older parents do good more in health effect from daughters than sons emotional care in Red china. J Aging Health. 2016 doi: 10.1177/0898264315620591. published online Jan ix. [PMC gratuitous commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
43. Zeng Y, George 50, Sereny One thousand, Gu D, Vaupel J. Older parents savor ameliorate filial piety and intendance from daughters than sons in China. Am J Med Res. 2016;3:244–72. [PMC gratis article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44. Teng H, Cao Z, Liu J, et al. Health status and burden of wellness intendance costs among urban elderly in China. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015;27:61S–68S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45. Liang Z. Suggestions concerning strategies of population and development in the side by side few decades. In: Liang Z, editor. Strategies of Population and Development. Taiyuan: Shanxi People's Press; 1985. pp. 1–xvi. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
46. Bongaarts J, Greenhalgh Due south. An alternative to the one-child policy in China. Popul Dev Rev. 1985;xi:585–618. [Google Scholar]
47. Greenhalgh South, Bongaarts J. Fertility policy in China: time to come options. Science. 1987;235:1167–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48. Gale JD. The shortcomings and options of China'southward rural population policy. Chinese Rural Econ. 1994;6:51–54. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
49. Zeng Y, Vaupel J. The impact of urbanization and delayed childbearing on population growth and aging in China. Popul Dev Rev. 1989;15:425–45. [Google Scholar]
50. Zeng Y. A soft-landing with the 2-children-late-birth policy: need and feasibility. Soc Sci China. 2006;58:93–109. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
51. Zeng Y. Chinese Population Yearbook (2014) Beijing: Communist china Academy of Social Sciences; 2015. Implementing the universal two-child policy as shortly every bit possible to realize the balanced development of population and socioeconomics in China; pp. 199–227. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
52. Liang J, Li J. Are there too many people in Prc? Beijing: Social Science Academic Press; 2012. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
53. Gu B, Ma X, Mao Z. Fertility want, fertility beliefs and fertility level. Beijing: Social Scientific discipline Academic Printing; 2014. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
54. Liang J, Li J, Huang W. Mainland china needs more babies: reconsideration of population policy in Prc. Beijing: Social Science Bookish Press; 2014. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
55. Qiao X. Two-kid for parents that ane of them is from one-child family unit, a wrong policy. Popul Dev. 2015;half dozen:ii–7. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
56. National Health and Family Planning Committee. Press conference of National Health and Family unit Planning Commission; July tenth, 2015. [Google Scholar]
57. Xiang H, Yang J. The development trend of China's population and population policy adjustment. Western Forum. 2015;25:twoscore–48. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
58. Feng 10, Li F. Do or don't? The birth preference and influence factor analysis of city reproductive-aged population with i child. J Natl Sch Admin. 2016;one:94–101. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
59. Qu J, Hesketh T. Family unit size, fertility preferences, and sex ratio in China in the era of the 1 child family policy: results from national family planning and reproductive health survey. BMJ. 2006;333:371–73. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60. Retherford R, Choe M, Chen J, Li 10, Cui H. How far has fertility in China really declined? Popul Dev Rev. 2005;31:57–84. [Google Scholar]
61. Zheng Y, Yuan J, Xu T, et al. Socio-economical condition and fertility intentions among Chinese women with one child. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2016;19:43–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62. Bongaarts J. Fertility and reproductive preference in post-transitional societies. Popul Dev Rev. 2001;27:260–81. [Google Scholar]
63. Zhang L, Wang G. A enquiry on the second childbirth expectation and the birth plan for the fertility age population of Chinese. Popul Econ. 2015;6:43–51. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
64. Zhu Yi, Zhu C. The 2d childbirth expectation and employment status: evidence from China Labor-force Dynamics Survey. Stud Labor Econ. 2015;3:110–28. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
65. Zhang X, Huang C, Zhang Q, Chen S, Fan Q. Fertility intention for the 2nd child under the selective and universal 2-child policies: comparisons and implications. Popul Res. 2016;one:87–97. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
66. Mu G. Ii-child policy: toward to mod population controlling. Chin Econ Rep. 2015;12:70–72. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
67. Wang J. The influence of fertility policy adjustment to the birth population size in People's republic of china. Popul J. 2015;ii:22–23. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
68. Yi Z, George LK. Population aging and sometime-age intendance in China. In: Dale D, Phillipson C, editors. Sage Handbook of Social Gerontology. Thou Oaks: Sage Publications; 2010. pp. 420–29. [Google Scholar]
70. Su D, Wu X, Zang Y, Li H, Wang Due west, Zhang J. Depression and social support between People's republic of china'southward rural and urban empty-nest elderly. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012;55:564–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
71. Lv Ten, Jiang Y, Sunday Y, et al. Short form 36-item wellness survey exam result on the empty nest elderly in Prc: a meta-analysis. Curvation Gerontol Geriatr. 2013;56:291–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
72. Zeng Y, Chen H, Wang Z, Country K. Implications of changes in households and living arrangements for hereafter home-based care needs and costs of disabled elders in China. J Aging Health. 2015;27:519–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
73. Peng Ten. People's republic of china'due south demographic history and hereafter challenges. Science. 2011;333:581–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
74. Herrmann Grand. Population crumbling and economic evolution: anxieties and policy responses. J Popul Aging. 2012;5:23–46. [Google Scholar]
75. Cai F, Wang D. The sustainment of China economic growth and its labor determinants. Econ Res J. 1999;x:62–68. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
76. Bloom D, Williamson J. Demographic transitions and economic miracles in emerging Asia. Earth Bank Econ Rev. 1998;12:419–55. [Google Scholar]
77. Lin JY. Economical development strategy, crumbling and population policies. In: Zeng Y, editor. Research on Elderly Population, Family, Health and Intendance Needs/Costs. Beijing: Scientific discipline Press; 2010. pp. 249–56. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
78. Lin JY. Economic development strategy and adjustment of current fertility policy. In: Zeng Y, Gu B, Liang J, Guo Z, editors. Fertility Policy Aligning and Development in Red china. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press; 2013. pp. i–11. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
79. Guo Z. Multi-level analysis on the sex ratio at birth in China based on the 2000 census and the regional fertility policy data. Popul Res. 2007;31:twenty–31. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
80. Yang J. Regional diverseness of fertility on child sex ratio in Red china. Popul Res. 2006;30:xxx–41. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
81. Song Y, Chen R. A micro empirical study of the effect of family unit planning policy on sex ratio at nativity. Popul Res. 2009;33:44–49. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
82. Gu B, Vocal J, Liu S, Wang J, Jiang 50. Practice and revelation of the two-kid policy experimental areas. Popul Res. 2008;32:33–49. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
83. Li S, Zhang Y, Feldman M. Nascence registration in China: practices, bug and policies. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2010;29:297–317. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
86. Chu J. Prenatal sex determination and sex-selective abortion in rural Prc. Popul Dev Rev. 2001;27:259–81. [Google Scholar]
87. Zeng Y. Implementing the universal two-child policy as soon as possible is a win-win policy for both the nation and people. Popul Econ. 2015;5:115–26. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
88. Huang H, Zhu W, Xie Y, Shuai C. The size of bereft families who lost their only kid is increasing, collective demands deserving imminent attention. Ref Aging. 2012;3 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
89. Wang G. "Only-child-death" family unit and its developing trends under the current family unit planning policy. Chin J Popul Sci. 2013;1:57–65. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
ninety. Pham-Kanter G, Goldman N. Practice sons reduce parental mortality? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66:710–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
91. Hi KJ, Dominicus Z, Ru YJ, Mi JY, Ren MX. Shortage of paediatricians in China. Lancet. 2014;383:954. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
92. Ren Z, Song P, Theodoratou E, Guo S, An Fifty. China'south man resources for maternal and child health-national sampling survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:561. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
93. Vocal Q, Wang F, Zhuang N, et al. The pediatric demands and gaps nether the universal 2 child policy. Mentum J Health Policy. 2016;9:65–70. [Google Scholar]
94. Staudinger U, Finkelstein R, Calvo E, Sivaramakrishnan K. A global view on the furnishings of work on health in afterwards life. Gerontologist. 2016;56:S281–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
95. Zeng Y. Furnishings of demographic and retirement-age policies on future pension deficits, with an application to People's republic of china. Popul Dev Rev. 2011;37:553–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
96. Laidlaw K, Wang D, Coelho C, Power 1000. Attitudes to aging and expectations for filial piety across Chinese and British cultures: A pilot exploratory evaluation. Aging Ment Wellness. 2010;14:283–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
97. Shen K. PhD thesis. National Schoolhouse of Development, Peking University; 2011. Comprehensive analyses of the living arrangement among Chinese elderly—its influential factors and the effects on well-being. [Google Scholar]
98. Shen K, Zhang Y, Yan P. The causal effect of family unit structure on female labor force participation. Popul Res. 2012;36:15–27. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
99. Zeng Y, Chen HS, Wang ZL, Land KC. Implications of changes in households and living arrangements for future habitation-based care needs and costs for disabled elders in China. J Aging Health. 2015;27:519–fifty. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
100. Liang Y. Prc may get enlightenment from Singapore'southward model of family back up for elderly. Going forward in the same boat. 2014;nine:36–37. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5944611/
0 Response to "Why Did China Relax Its "One-child" Policy in 2015 and Allow Two Children Per Family? Quizlet"
Enregistrer un commentaire